> Modified the resize algorithm to work well with fractional scale, thanks for 
> deeper understanding of the problem thanks to  @hjohn and @mstr2 .
> 
> Removed earlier manual tester in favor of the monkey tester.
> 
> It is important to note that even though the constraints are given by the 
> user in unsnapped coordinates, they are converted to snapped values, since 
> the snapped values correspond to the actual pixels on the display.  This 
> means the tests that validate honoring constraints should, in all the cases 
> where (scale != 1.0), assume possibly error not exceeding (1.0 / scale).

Andy Goryachev has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a 
merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 35 commits:

 - Merge branch 'master' into 8299753.resize
 - Merge branch 'master' into 8299753.resize
 - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into 8299753.resize
 - Merge branch 'master' into 8299753.resize
 - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into 8299753.resize
 - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into 8299753.resize
 - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into 8299753.resize
 - Merge branch 'master' into 8299753.resize
 - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into 8299753.resize
 - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into 8299753.resize
 - ... and 25 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/compare/b8987310...19827de5

-------------

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1156/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jfx&pr=1156&range=01
  Stats: 479 lines in 9 files changed: 165 ins; 222 del; 92 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1156.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jfx.git pull/1156/head:pull/1156

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1156

Reply via email to