On Tue, 9 Dec 2025 10:43:36 GMT, Jose Pereda <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hmm. I see what you are saying, and can confirm the behavior. With your >> proposed fix, though, it seems like we will still have a situation where an >> in-use screen object is no longer in the list of screens. When this happens >> it will point to the same native screen object as one of the newly-created >> screens. This seems fragile. >> >> Maybe we could still dispose all old screens, but do it in a way that allows >> it to later be mapped to a new screen? Or, thinking out loud, maybe "put >> back" the screens that didn't actually change as the result of the DPI >> change notification? >> >> I'll want to think about this and take a closer look, but it will be a >> couple days before I can get to it. > > @kevinrushforth did you have the chance to have a look at this? Sorry for the delay. I'm pretty backed up on reviews and plan to get to this soon. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1964#discussion_r2603841051
