On Tue, 23 Dec 2025 23:34:59 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Thanks. I saw that, but hadn't had time to respond. I'll do that in the next >> day or two. > > As you no doubt saw from my reply, I didn't get to the discussion. Since this > is a preview feature, we can leave the resolution of this until later if you > want. I like the idea you have in that thread of providing API to return the > declaring class rather than relying on convention. So I think it's OK to > leave this how you have it. In anticipation of `Property`-level support for attached properties, I've decided not to encode the declaring class into the property name at this point. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1936#discussion_r2644822433
