On Fri, 9 Jan 2026 15:53:35 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <[email protected]> wrote:
>> @kevinrushforth This is a typo that affects an already-approved CSR, but >> fixing it doesn't meaningfully change the specification. Given that I'd like >> to get this PR in for JFX 26, how do we continue here? > > Since it is not a material change that would, by itself, need a CSR, go ahead > and proceed with the integration. To clarify a bit, you can fix this now if you like (it will require a re-review of the PR) or file a follow-up bug and fix it. It's probably easiest to fix it now. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1844#discussion_r2676714976
