On Mon, 12 Jan 2026 09:56:41 GMT, Huang Xiao <[email protected]> wrote:
> I forgot to mention that since I'm just a regular user, I couldn't figure out > how to become a member You are an `Author`, so you should be able to login to https://bugs.openjdk.org/issues/?filter=39543. See also the message from `@bridgekeeper` > Welcome back youngledo Without checking your example, simply removing both lines of code is certainly not the right fix. This was implemented to fix problems, so I'm pretty sure this will lead to regressions. Also note that you should check if applying https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/1945 fixes your problem, as this is an issue that could lead to many unnecessary relayouts right now. Note that I believe that the performance of the `VirtualFlow` can be improved a lot, but I'm not sure this is the right approach / the right place. Example: the `removeAll` should not be triggered that often and the pile should not be that big. If it is, we may need to check out why this is first. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/2030#issuecomment-3739399553
