On Mon, 31 Aug 2026 17:53:09 GMT, Andy Goryachev <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I don't think the question about whether or not tested by O. is relevant. >> >> Apart from that, I don't have a strong opinion. On one hand, I think it is >> relevant to indicate that there is ongoing work for platforms that are not >> in mainstream releases. On the other hand, I don't want to give the >> impression that JavaFX for iOS runs out of the box. >> My main reason for including it is that I think we don't want too many rules >> about what issues are not in the release notes. Unless there are excellent >> reasons that can easily be justified without much discussion, it seems >> better to me to have the issues that come out of the filter you and I use in >> the release notes. > > A bit off-topic, my fear is that since we don't test android/iOS, it is > possible some of our changes inadvertently break those platforms - something > I want to avoid. I am sure you guys deal with the conflicts and the testing > on those platforms in a reactive manner, so the release always works. > > Question - would it make sense to configure the github actions to build on > those platforms so we'll have an advance warning when we break things? Speaking of the release notes, would it make sense to have a separate section that talks about android/iOS specifics, or you would rather not? ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/2256#discussion_r3896974424
