On Thu, 3 Sep 2026 09:31:34 GMT, Marius Hanl <[email protected]> wrote:

> This is an idea to move out the `:apps` build from the `build.gradle`.
> And to add an `INCLUDE_APPS` flag, that is now `false` by default to control 
> whether we actually want to build the `:apps` when running `gradle all` or if 
> we actually need to clean them when running `gradle clean`.
> 
> I see two advantages:
> - IMO, the main `build.gradle` should focus on JavaFX and not so much on 
> anything else, like apps
> - As of now, when I did run `gradle clean`, I always need to install `Ant`, 
> just because the apps are also cleaned which I did not even build before.
> This is problematic, because:
>   - I think most of the people do not have `Ant`, it is very rarely used 
> nowadays
>   - It is also not preinstalled in pretty much every OS / distribution I 
> tried. And I usually only installed for `OpenJFX` and never need it for 
> anything else. If possible, it would be good if this is not needed if you 
> just want to run tests and build JavaFX
>     - For reference, when running CachyOS I could just build JavaFX out of 
> the box without ever installing anything.  This is a very nice experience and 
> should help people to contribute. The only thing I did run into was, well, 
> `Ant` when running `gradle clean`
> 
> ---------
> - [x] I confirm that I make this contribution in accordance with the [OpenJDK 
> Interim AI Policy](https://openjdk.org/legal/ai).

I'll take a look at this at some point, but whatever is done, the default needs 
to remain such that `gradle all` builds the apps.

build.gradle line 480:

> 478: // When disabled, the "apps", "appsjar" and "clean" tasks will not 
> compile or clean the apps in there.
> 479: defineProperty("INCLUDE_APPS", "false")
> 480: ext.IS_INCLUDE_APPS = Boolean.parseBoolean(INCLUDE_APPS)

No, `gradle all` needs to build the apps without any extra flags.

-------------

Changes requested by kcr (Lead).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/2291#pullrequestreview-5106125917
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/2291#discussion_r3928109494

Reply via email to