Le mardi 28 février 2012 à 08:08, Eric Lemoine a écrit :
> > > On Thursday, February 23, 2012, Andreas Hocevar wrote: > > This starts to look like a plan. A lot of work ahead, so keep the pull > > requests (to both docs and openlayers) coming. > > > > When the release contains different profiles, it is also not a big > > deal if something is missing in a stripped down build, because people > > can always switch to the full build if something is missing. > > > So is the plan to ship two builds in the release archive, a full build and a > light build? That sounds good to me. I wonder if we should also provide a > mobile-specific build. And yes, we'll need to provide some text file in the > release archive to describe what these builds are and provide, and how to > create custom builds. Just a matter of taste but I think we should promote the use of the light and the custom build. I'd like to see: - «OpenLayers.js» as the light build, - «OpenLayers.FULL.js» as the complete build And use in OL website the light «OpenLayers.js» whenever it’s possible. PS: thanks Bart for bringing the discussion here. > > Also, do we continue to provide online versions on openlayers.org > (http://openlayers.org)? And do we also have online versions with both full > and light builds? > > Thanks, > > -- > Eric Lemoine > > Camptocamp France SAS > Savoie Technolac, BP 352 > 73377 Le Bourget du Lac, Cedex > > Tel : 00 33 4 79 44 44 96 > Mail : [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) > http://www.camptocamp.com > > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
