Hey Phil,

I promise you once you try it out (github pull requests) you don't want to do 
manual patches anymore, you will call that clumsy. I was skeptical at first as 
well.

I agree that the github issue tracker misses some of the Trac features (as you 
point out), however having the issue tracker closer to the versioning system 
brings in more benefit IMHO.

Best regards,
Bart

-- 
Bart van den Eijnden
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.



On May 24, 2012, at 12:09 AM, Phil Scadden wrote:

>  
> >For that specific case (assuming it's plain text), use something like 
> >https://gist.github.com/ and provide a link in the ticket.
> 
> How clumsy is that? I would have to ask why on earth do this? This is moving 
> from a pretty sophisticated bug/feature tracking system to something 
> extremely primitive. What is the benefit in doing this? None that I can see 
> as far reporting bugs - its just become a lot more difficult. And for 
> developers, it appears you lose the ability to filter by category (bug, 
> feature, improvment etc), or look at priority.
> Notice: This email and any attachments are confidential. If received in error 
> please destroy and immediately notify us. Do not copy or disclose the 
> contents.
> 
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev

_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev

Reply via email to