https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10088
--- Comment #7 from g...@zifbang.com --- (In reply to Quanah Gibson-Mount from comment #5) > (In reply to Quanah Gibson-Mount from comment #4) > > (In reply to git from comment #3) > > > I suppose that the closure of this issue without any response means that > > > the > > > solution is to figure out how to revert back to HDB? > > > > It was marked as a duplicate of an existing issue since that's what it is. > > See that ITS for further details. > > As a side note, back-bdb/hdb no longer exist in any release past 2.4. I'd > suggest not making absurdly long name values. I don't get to make that decision. First, the test is to prove that `ldapjs` has no problem with such long attribute names (https://github.com/ldapjs/node-ldapjs/issues/480). Second, the spec does not impose any limit on attribute names (https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4514). Given that this worked in prior versions, and does not in recent versions, it is clearly a regression that should be addressed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.
