Michael Ströder <[email protected]> wrote: > Why not a simple ACL for a group? Do the applications bind anonymously?
Of course it does. I said it was ill-designed :-) > > A nicer approach would probably to have a hidden jpegPhoto: it would not > > be sent to a client requesting all attributes, but a client explicitely > > requesting a set of attribute including jpegPhoto would get it. > > I guess you will run into problems with some apps where you do want the > jpegPhoto to be displayed. Fortunately, the only apps I have that use the jpegPhoto are wise enough to provide a set of attributes. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz [email protected]
