Quanah Gibson-Mount writes: > This was just a checkpoint to make sure what was done so far doesn't break > anything.
Ah, OK. >> Some issues it'd be nice to have in, if they're simple for those who >> know the code in question: >> >> ITS#6760 rwm broken entry handling >> Fixed, I think, but needs review > > This will be in the next set. Someone's OKed it? I copied/moved what some of the code was doing, but I don't know why it was doing it. (Noted in the ITS.) >> ITS#6532 Support for common orderingMatching rules in extensible match >> filters TODO: Handle CSN and UUID ordering match too? >> (Almost certainly OK, but I wanted someone who knows to say so. It's >> a two-line update, setting the SLAP_MR_EXT flag for these rules.) >> >> Also, possibly the rest of "ITS#6739 broken do_syncrep2()" is simple. >> Almost fixed. > > If you get these committed, I can add them. I've committed my part, but someone who knows syncrepl must do the rest. -- Hallvard
