------=_Part_7580_3624331.1212031000971 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline
Hi, Quanah: I'm considering upgrading from 2.3 to 2.4.x. I haven't test 2.4.x yet. Does this bug exist in 2.4.x too? Regards, Hai On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 1:31 AM, Quanah Gibson-Mount <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --On Tuesday, May 27, 2008 10:10 AM +0000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Full_Name: Zhao Hai >> Version: 2.3.41 >> OS: Linux 2.4.21 arm >> URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/zhaohai-080527.patch >> Submission from: (NULL) (205.209.140.4) >> >> >> Problem: >> race condition makes incorrect timestamp in replogfile, cause certain >> modification of entries not replicate to slurp slaves. >> >> replica: 180.0.10.2:1234 >> replica: 180.0.10.3:1234 >> time: 1211855467 >> ^^^^^^^^^^ this timestamp >> >> How to reproduce the problem: >> 1) run under very slow machines (my environ: arm 266MHz) >> 2) slapd is configed to generate replogfile >> 3) ldapadd about 5 entries, then ldapmodify 2 entries without delay. >> > > This is fixed in RE23. If there is ever a 2.3.43 release, it will be in > that. In the meantime, I'd advise using 2.3.42 + your patch. > > Regards, > Quanah > > > > -- > > Quanah Gibson-Mount > Principal Software Engineer > Zimbra, Inc > -------------------- > Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration > ------=_Part_7580_3624331.1212031000971 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi, Quanah:<br><br>I'm considering upgrading from 2.3 to 2.4.x. I haven't test 2.4.x yet. Does this bug exist in 2.4.x too?<br><br>Regards,<br>Hai<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 1:31 AM, Quanah Gibson-Mount <<a href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</a>> wrote:<br> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">--On Tuesday, May 27, 2008 10:10 AM +0000 <a href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]" target="_blank">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</a> wrote:<br> <br> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Full_Name: Zhao Hai<br> Version: 2.3.41<br> OS: Linux 2.4.21 arm<br> URL: <a href="ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/zhaohai-080527.patch"; target="_blank">ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/zhaohai-080527.patch</a><br> Submission from: (NULL) (<a href="http://205.209.140.4"; target="_blank">205.209.140.4</a>)<br> <br> <br> Problem:<br> race condition makes incorrect timestamp in replogfile, cause certain<br> modification of entries not replicate to slurp slaves.<br> <br> replica: <a href="http://180.0.10.2:1234"; target="_blank">180.0.10.2:1234</a><br> replica: <a href="http://180.0.10.3:1234"; target="_blank">180.0.10.3:1234</a><br> time: 1211855467<br> ^^^^^^^^^^ this timestamp<br> <br> How to reproduce the problem:<br> 1) run under very slow machines (my environ: arm 266MHz)<br> 2) slapd is configed to generate replogfile<br> 3) ldapadd about 5 entries, then ldapmodify 2 entries without delay.<br> </blockquote> <br></div></div> This is fixed in RE23. If there is ever a 2.3.43 release, it will be in that. In the meantime, I'd advise using 2.3.42 + your patch.<br> <br> Regards,<br> Quanah<br><font color="#888888"> <br> <br> <br> --<br> <br> Quanah Gibson-Mount<br> Principal Software Engineer<br> Zimbra, Inc<br> --------------------<br> Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration<br> </font></blockquote></div><br> ------=_Part_7580_3624331.1212031000971--
