--On Tuesday, July 31, 2012 11:41 AM +0000 [email protected] wrote: > On 07/30/2012 08:38 PM, Michael Str?der wrote: >> Jan Synacek wrote: >>> On 07/27/2012 10:47 PM, [email protected] wrote: >>>> It seems there's a regression in slapo-constraint possibly caused by a >>>> patch for ITS#7168. >>> >>> This works for me: >>> >>> slapd.ldif: >>> ... >>> dn: olcOverlay=constraint,olcDatabase={1}bdb,cn=config >>> objectClass: olcOverlayConfig >>> objectClass: olcConstraintConfig >>> olcOverlay: constraint >>> olcConstraintAttribute: mail count 3 >>> olcConstraintAttribute: description count 2 >>> ... >> >> From the excerpt above it seems you've only added a count constraint. >> >> Please use more features of slapo-constraint for testing, e.g. regex- or >> URL-based constraints. >> >> The patch for ITS#7168 broke all my customer setups since I'm >> slapo-constraint quite heavily. >> >> Ciao, Michael. >> > > I'm having hard time reproducing this. Still works for me. > > Please provide a minimal setup and an example that fails, so I can fix the > patch. Thank you.
Hi Michael, Have you had any luck in providing a configuration that doesn't work to Jan, so this can be resolved? Thanks, Quanah -- Quanah Gibson-Mount Sr. Member of Technical Staff Zimbra, Inc A Division of VMware, Inc. -------------------- Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
