Ignacio Casal Quinteiro wrote: > FWIW any chance to reconsider having both build systems?
I have no desire to support multiple build systems. The Project does not = support any tools that we don't use ourselves. The files you add significantly increase the line count, and don't even c= ontain any comments. In contrast, the current Makefile is mostly comments. > with meson it is easy to build on windows. Plus I'd like you > to see at these numbers: >=20 > time make: > real=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0m5.629s > user=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0m5.197s > sys=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0m0.399s >=20 > time meson build > real=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0m0.452s > user=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0m0.335s > sys=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0m0.131s >=20 > time ninja -C build > real=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0m0.992s > user=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0m1.812s > sys=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0m0.362s >=20 > You can see that configuring and building with meson is faster than jus= t using make On my system the majority of build time is in gcc itself. The proportion = of time that make itself uses is trivial. I would guess the only reason you're seeing = a speedup is because meson parallelizes the build. You would get the same effect using= "make -jXX". >=20 > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 6:31 PM Ignacio Casal Quinteiro <nacho.resa@gmai= l.com <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >=20 > yeah... knowing my previous tries with lmdb I did not have much hop= e... >=20 > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 6:21 PM Howard Chu <[email protected] <mailto:hy= [email protected]>> wrote: >=20 > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> wrote: > > Full_Name: Ignacio Casal Quinteiro > > Version: > > OS: > > URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ > > Submission from: (NULL) (54.239.6.177) > > > > > > Meson is the new thing out there, >=20 > No. --=20 -- Howard Chu CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/
