Howard Chu dixit: >The remaining format patches for debug statements will have no impact >on the correctness of execution or output. This and all of the >following patches are being rejected.
There are multiple systems on which sizeof(time_t) > sizeof(long), with more expected as 2038 dawns. Are you saying you want to prohibit users on these platforms from debugging OpenLDAP? >> --- a/contrib/slapd-modules/smbk5pwd/smbk5pwd.c >> +++ b/contrib/slapd-modules/smbk5pwd/smbk5pwd.c >> @@ -605,7 +605,7 @@ static int smbk5pwd_exop_passwd( >> =09=09keys[0].bv_val =3D ch_malloc( LDAP_PVT_INTTYPE_CHARS(long) ); >> =09=09keys[0].bv_len =3D snprintf(keys[0].bv_val, >> =09=09=09LDAP_PVT_INTTYPE_CHARS(long), >> -=09=09=09"%ld", slap_get_time()); >> +=09=09=09"%lld", (long long)slap_get_time()); >> =09=09BER_BVZERO( &keys[1] ); This doesn=E2=80=99t look like debugging output to me. bye, //mirabilos --=20 Yes, I hate users and I want them to suffer. =09-- Marco d'Itri on gmane.linux.debian.devel.general
