On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 01:30:18PM +0000, [email protected] wrote: > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 11:28:40PM +0000, [email protected] wrote: >> The consumer did not replicate the database as a part of the initial >> search, so I don't think it qualifies as "up to date". I.e., it's primary >> DB remains empty. > > Ah, that wasn't mentioned, my assumption was that the source DB was > actually empty. > > This is coming from ITS#8281 fix in cd8ff37629012c1676ef79de164a159da9b2ae89.
I've pushed a change that makes sure we end up with a contexCSN, generating one if necessary whenever we're configured to be a master (olcMirrorMode is set or no olcSyncrepl exists) here: https://github.com/mistotebe/openldap/tree/its9015 It's kind of a followup on this (reverting part of ITS#8281 above): https://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-devel/201904/msg00015.html -- OndÅej KuznÃk Senior Software Engineer Symas Corporation http://www.symas.com Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP
