Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: > > > --On Wednesday, April 12, 2006 4:10 PM -0400 matthew sporleder > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > Apr 11 15:21:22 labogldir02 slapd[16232]: [ID 658149 local6.debug] >>> > ldbm_back_db_open: alock package is unstable; database may be >>> > inconsistent! >>> > Apr 11 15:21:22 labogldir02 slapd[16232]: [ID 100111 local6.debug] >>> > slapd starting > > I would really rethink using LDBM, especially since you are upgrading to > a modern version of OpenLDAP. > > Now that you've started slapd, and alock is created, does LDBM continue > to complain, or are things happy?
Just for the records: OpenLDAP often complains about alock package even when using back-bdb or back-hdb. Ciao, Michael.
