On 4/27/06, Quanah Gibson-Mount <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quoting matthew sporleder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > On my systems, at least, OpenLDAP does handle this correctly. However, > > I am > > > only using a single shared memory segment, and I'm using BDB 4.2.52. > > > > > > Based off the configuration you sent in, I'm not exactly clear why you > > set > > > up so many subordinate databases instead of just using a single > > database. > > > Certainly your performance would improve by using a single database, > > and > > > you'd get better resource usage... > > > > > > --Quanah > > > > I'll compile 4.2.52 and retry some testing soon. I was having trouble > > finding sleepycat docs for 4.2.52 to see if the db_open/shm api had > > changed between them. > > > > The main reason for having multiple subordinates is replication, but > > it's also because the three main branches are used by different > > applications so they require different index management, utilize > > different schemas, etc. (these four definitions are a consolidation > > from 140+ ;) > > Ah, fun. > > As a side note, I assume you patched BDB 4.4.20 with the two patches > released by sleepycat, right? :) >
Umm.. no. But I'm recompiling now. Maybe this is the culprit: http://dev.sleepycat.com/resources/faq_show.html?id=114
