--On Thursday, May 25, 2006 6:29 PM -0700 Jed Donnelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm wondering if we shouldn't switch our production services back to slurpd until syncrepl is production ready? Switching back all our replicas would be a real pain, so I'm willing to try just upgrading the master and then even upgrading the replicas one at a time if needed. However, if we still have problems then I'm thinking that we might be better off going back to slurpd. Does anybody else have any experience to share regarding the production quality of the sync-repl code?
I've been using delta-syncrepl in my test/development environment for several months. I plan on moving my production servers to using delta-syncrepl in the next month or so, and stop using slurpd. I consider it production ready with the 2.3.23 release, which fixed up some issues that were particular to delta-syncrepl.
The issue fixed with syncrepl itself in 2.3.22 was most particularly affecting one person with an interesting setup, but it is always worthwhile to run a version with the fix than to not have it, I think....
--Quanah -- Quanah Gibson-Mount Principal Software Developer ITS/Shared Application Services Stanford University GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html
