On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 10:43:05AM -0300, Andreas Hasenack wrote: > I was reading the appendix A of RFC4533 (about syncrepl and CSN) and the > definition of contextCSN is as follows: > > "The context CSN is the greatest committed entry CSN that is not greater > than any outstanding (uncommitted) entry CSNs for all entries in a > directory context." > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > Regarding openldap-2.3.25 and a provider with two glued databases, are > these two databases included in the "directory context" as mentioned > above? If they are not, this could perhaps explain some of the problems > I'm having with syncrepl and glued databases (ITS#4626). > > One of the > databases is a provider only (with data loaded with slapadd) and the > other (subordinate) is a consumer AND a provider. The last consumer has > only one database and is a backup server: replication to this one just > doesn't work.
For example, it's easy to trigger this kind of error in the provider which has the two databases glued together: Entry ou=Global,dc=example,dc=com CSN 20060818140635Z#000000#00#000000 greater than snapshot 20060818135903Z#000000#00#000000 Has anybody else seen this?