<quote who="Tony Earnshaw"> > Gavin Henry wrote: > >> I notice that misc.schema says at the top: >> >> 20 # Not recommended for production use! >> 21 # Use with extreme caution! >> >> This definitely the case?, as I wanted to use 'nisMailAlias' and >> 'rfc822MailMember' from it, but not sure now. >> >> I've done our own schema ages ago with >> suretecMailAlias/suretecMailAliasMember, so might stick with that, but >> wanted to use a bundled schema for most things. >> >> Should we stick with our own for Mail Aliases, or use bundled? > > We've been using it in production for (literally) years with no > problems; I guess somebody should remove those two lines, I never > noticed them ...
Is an ITS the best place? Cheers. > > --Tonni > > -- > Tonni Earnshaw > tonni @ barlaeus.nl >
