On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 02:44:19AM -0700, Howard Chu wrote: > Just because the protocol was defined a particular way (consumer > initiated single master replication) doesn't mean it can't be used in > other ways. OpenLDAP is far more flexible than that. We've enhanced the > basic syncrepl functionality a number of different ways (delta-syncrepl, > proxied syncrepl, mirrormode, and multimaster) all without altering any > of the syncrepl protocol definition. All it takes is a little creativity > to assemble the pieces in the proper order.
And what are the reasons for not using slurpd? It has less functionnalities, but can it be considered reliable? Should I change my working setup for syncrepl, or can I live with slurpd? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
