Dieter Kluenter wrote: > RFC 2255 describes URL extensions like bindname and x-foo. RFC 4516 > only shows a hypothetical example with e- extension. Part A1 of RFC > 4516 says that bindname had been removed due to lack of known > implementations.
More discussion: http://www.openldap.org/lists/ietf-ldapbis/200404/msg00070.html > sdb-ldap from Stig Venaas is such an > implementation. And also web2ldap supports bindname extension (and X-BINDPW but which is not recommended to be use in your bookmarks for anything serious)... > Now my question: is OpenLDAP-2.4 still honoring bindname > and x-bindpw extensions? Did OpenLDAP ever implement it? And for which purpose? Ciao, Michael.