Quanah Gibson-Mount a écrit : > --On Friday, October 05, 2007 4:20 PM +0200 Guillaume Rousse > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Guillaume Rousse a écrit : >>> Hello. >>> >>> I'm trying to follow change propagations errors using delta-synrepl in >>> search & persist mode, by using an accesslog overlay both on master and >>> on slaves. >> About the error themselves, I clearly see changes commited in the master >> (version 2.3.27) not being propagated to one of the slave (version >> 2.3.27 also), whereas propagated to the second slave (version 2.3.34), >> by examining the access log on both slaves. > > See the fixes since 2.3.27, and see my earlier reply about the major > flaws in your sites policies. I saw, that's also why I'm trying to identify what's the exact problem I'm facing, which is quite difficult (I just found log level 16384 seems to be what i need, tough). I'd rather not upgrade just because 'it might eventually solve the issue'.
And you didn't replied to my actual question: among the four kind of syncrepl usage (delta vs total, search and persist vs refresh only), are some of them more robust than others ? -- Guillaume Rousse Moyens Informatiques - INRIA Futurs Tel: 01 69 35 69 62
