--On Thursday, August 21, 2008 1:55 AM -0700 Howard Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Wednesday, August 20, 2008 6:57 PM -0400 David Hawes<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Is this expected behavior in any way?
Yes. How can it know that it needs to replicate a change on the entry if
the change is no longer present? You need to restore from a recent
backup.
No!!
When the replica's cookie CSN isn't found in the provider's accesslog
it's supposed to force a fallback to regular syncrepl. Come on Quanah,
you're one of the people who actually tested that functionality...
Hence my follow up. ;)
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
--------------------
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
