Pierangelo Masarati a écrit :
----- "Aaron Richton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
First, using a distinct database doesn't allow to provide a virtual
view
from a branch in my original database to another branch in the same
database. Meaning, I can't have ou=telephony,dc=myprefix a virtual
view
of ou=users,dc=myprefix, I need to use a distinct prefix.
Have you tried declaring the ou=telephony,dc=myprefix back-relay
subordinate to dc=myprefix back-$END?
I was about to reply the same, but you anticipated me :)
I've tried the above, and it works as expected as soon as the "relay" statement
is omitted. In fact, it requires the superior database to already exist. Probably, that
test should either be relaxed or moved to db_open().
Actually, subordinate is not really needed, just declaring the inner
database before the other is OK:
database relay
suffix "ou=telephony,dc=myprefix"
overlay rwm
rwm-suffixmassage "ou=users,dc=myprefix"
database bdb
suffix "dc=myprefix"
Making the first one subordinate to the second has the unwanted
side-effect of having all requests for user starting from top-level
suffix (example: ldapvi --user '(uid=foo)' now return two users instead
of one, so I'd likely avoid it.
--
Guillaume Rousse
Moyens Informatiques - INRIA Futurs
Tel: 01 69 35 69 62
