On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Howard Chu <h...@symas.com> wrote: > Brett @Google wrote: > > Sorry for the "fuzzy" logic :P, but : >> >> My thoughts for no: >> >> 1. The name will affect only the name of the backend module, which is >> logically a unit under the scope of openldap (and all backends share a >> prefix), it can't exist by itself. >> > > This point is false; libmdb builds on its own and is intended for use in > more than just OpenLDAP. (I already spelled this out in my LDAPCon > presentation...) I've ported SQLite to use it, for example, and I will be > porting it to Cyrus SASL (sasldb), Heimdal, and various other miscellaneous > stuff that comes along. The API is fully documented in Doxygen, and part of > the reason I went to that trouble was to ensure that other programmers > could use it easily.
Mmm. That sounds interesting. I have only just read your LDAPCon presentation, i have been away. Will the source for mmdb library itself eventually live separately somewhere, or just bundled with ldap ? Cheers Brett -- *The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education.* * Albert Einstein*
