Ulrich Windl wrote:
Howard Chu <h...@symas.com> schrieb am 15.05.2014 um 05:14 in Nachricht
There's no point in people writing email replies to you if you're incapable
of
reading. If you're unwilling to read information that people provide you in
links, you're just wasting everyone's time.
But there's also no point in writing replies like "it's documented" (as if the
writer has found it) without giving the proof (i.e.: URI).
Finding such a response in a mailing list archive is just as useless IMHO. (You
may supress the flame that usually follows such replies).
You will note that I always specify where something is documented. In this case:
If you didn't read the debates from the openldap-devel mailing list back when
this was first covered, you've got no business rehashing the conversation now.
If you didn't actually spend any of your own time writing code to test an
approach, failing, and trying another approach, you've got no right to demand
any particular implementation from anyone else.
http://www.openldap.org/conf/odd-wien-2003/proceedings.html
Which you can plainly see in the archive
http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-technical/201405/msg00105.html
--
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/