On Tue, 2014-09-16 at 21:38 +0100, Howard Chu wrote: > Brendan Kearney wrote: > > list, > > > > i am wondering what the right way is to introduce new OIDs, or request > > that new OIDs be introduced, to existing schemas. the ipNetwork class > > could benefit with a couple new optional attributes. > > The ipNetwork class is part of RFC2307, I suggest you write a new Internet > Draft defining the attributes you propose and send it to the ldapext mailing > list for discussion. > > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ldapext/current/maillist.html > > > > > the ipNetworkVLAN (only a suggested name) can be used to indicate the > > VLAN associated with an ipNetworkNumber. due to the increasing use of > > VLANs, the datapoint being represented in LDAP makes sense to me. > > > > another seemingly logical OID would be ipNetCIDR (suggestion only) which > > would be similar to the ipNetmaskNumber, but would be the short form > > notation. > > > > thank you, > > > > brendan kearney > > > > > > > >
Please excuse my ignorance on the subject, but is a specific format required? are specific details required? a template or any suggested reading would be greatly appreciated. thank you, brendan kearney
