Am Wed, 2 Sep 2020 11:11:56 +0200 schrieb Olaf Hopp <[email protected]>:
> Hi everybody, > > we are at the point of reorganising our LDAP. > Currently we only have posixGroups, but in future we also want to > support groupOfNames or groupOfUniqueNames > My question what is the common sense of usage ? > groupOfNames or groupOfUniqueNames ? > > I know your answers, you will say "it depends on your applications" > but currently I have no application using it. All my current > applications use my posixGroups. I just want to extend my LDAP for > future use cases. > > So what to take : groupOf Names or groupOfUniqueNames besides > posixGroup ? I would vote for groupOfnames. If you prefer groupOfUniqueNames you should provide uniqueness. https://ldapwiki.com/wiki/GroupOfUniqueNames%20vs%20groupOfNames https://ldapwiki.com/wiki/UniqueMember The use of posixgroup depends on your requirements. -Dieter -- Dieter Klünter | Systemberatung http://sys4.de GPG Key ID: E9ED159B 53°37'09,95"N 10°08'02,42"E
