>>> Michael Ströder <mich...@stroeder.com> schrieb am 02.08.2021 um 09:57 in Nachricht <59abdf98-65a4-5bb4-fffb-f13849697...@stroeder.com>: > On 8/2/21 8:06 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote: >>>>> Michael Ströder <mich...@stroeder.com> schrieb am 31.07.2021 um 18:05 in >> Nachricht <60ec1d1e-a2be-95a2-c9c4-24ecd9b4f...@stroeder.com>: >>> As far as I understood the MDB disk format changed. So the MDB files >>> have to be re-created (either by simply removing/replicating or >>> slapcat/slapadd). Right? >> >> AFAIK; Sleepycat DB could do that conversion on the fly. > > AFAICS the DB layout is application-specific. So there was also no way > to let Berkeley-DB do this "on the fly".
Of course Berkely DB cannot upgrade the MDB database; I was talking about the layout versions of Berkeley DB. > >> At least there should be some smarter conversion utility than export old DB >> with old binary and re-import with new binary. MHO. > > I have no issue with rebuilding the MDB files. I just want to know > whether I have to do it or not. > > Ciao, Michael.
