The commits should mention 4.9 migration 19.03.2012 18:37 пользователь "Pete Oakloan" <[email protected]> написал:
> oh, i did that - no dice. i got the wrapper code through the openlaszlo > app-console. > > so, as alexei mentioned earlier - there was an OM version working proxied > per default? > which revision? > > and... > > from what you are writing, it seems u had it already running - if > > half-heartedly - but still. > > could you point me to how u did it exactly? even to reach the point u > > describe above would be nice for me. > > :) > > kind regards, > pete > > Am 19. März 2012 15:29 schrieb [email protected] < > [email protected]> > : > > > *what exactly do you mean by this, what to fix?* > > => You might simply download (or copy source) of the html website that > > loads in proxied modus => copy that into a new website and replace the > > path/name of the SWF that is loaded with the URL to your solo compiled > SWF. > > > > Sebastian > > > > 2012/3/19 Pete Oakloan <[email protected]> > > > > > Hi seba, > > > > > > > > > Am 19. März 2012 15:10 schrieb [email protected] < > > > [email protected]> > > > : > > > > > > > I think it is more a problem of the lz.embed (JavaScript Code). > > > > I don't think it has something to do with solo or not in general. > > > > > > > > > > > what exactly do you mean by this, what to fix? > > > > > > > > > > However my status of the HTML component is that: > > > > - It is not possible to catch clicks in the iFrame / HTML-component > > > > - It is not possible to catch changes of the iFrame / HTML-component > > > > - It is forbidden by browser's cross-site-scripting policy to read > or > > > set > > > > the URL of the iFrame > > > > > > > > > > basically just viewing would be ok. > > > > > > > > > > Besides that it seemed to me that Firefox + Windows has some glitches > > > with > > > > the z-Layer overlay of HTML content over an Flash Applet. However > this > > > > might be solved already. > > > > But the first 3 points are still valid. The only thing that you > _could_ > > > do > > > > with it is that the moderator enters an URL and everybody else can by > > > > synced. However as soon as the moderator clicks into the HTML site => > > no > > > > even will be broadcasted. > > > > Also I don't know any possibility to prevent that the users just > browse > > > > somewhere else in that mini browser window. > > > > > > > > > > > from what you are writing, it seems u had it already running - if > > > half-heartedly - but still. > > > could you point me to how u did it exactly? even to reach the point u > > > describe above would be nice for me. > > > > > > kind regards, > > > pete > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian > > > > > > > > 2012/3/19 Pete Oakloan <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > Hi Alexei, > > > > > > > > > > it boils down to me trying to use the openlaszlo <html> tag in a > > > <view>, > > > > > replacing the whiteboard. > > > > > however, testing this tag in a minimal environment (3-line lzx file > > > > > actually) i found out there are problems in SOLO mode. > > > > > it works flawlessly in proxied, though. > > > > > > > > > > one possibility would be to try and compile a single component to - > > > say - > > > > > dhtml. but as far as i can tell it's not possible > > > > > to give different runtime-targets to different parts of OM. > > > > > > > > > > any ideas? > > > > > > > > > > error log is not sufficient i'm afraid. my test.lzx works proxied > > with > > > > > ?lzr=swf8, however stays blank when compiled to swf8 via cli > > > > > and then tested in browser. > > > > > > > > > > i think it's some kind of deep openlaszlo problem. unfortunately, > the > > > > > community over there seems kind of... inactive. > > > > > the <html> tag in SOLO mode has been an issue since 2007 (or > > openlaszlo > > > > > 4.0.5 - we are 4.9.0 now). > > > > > > > > > > kind regards, > > > > > pete > > > > > > > > > > Am 19. März 2012 14:46 schrieb Alexei Fedotov < > > > [email protected] > > > > >: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Pete, > > > > > > that was possible. > > > > > > > > > > > > Now Openmeetings does not contain the whole OpenLaszlo > distribution > > > > > > requied for running in proxied mode, > > > > > > but the better clue should be the corresponding error log. > > > > > > > > > > > > Why would you need this? > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями, > > > > > > Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов, > > > > > > http://dataved.ru/ > > > > > > +7 916 562 8095 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Pete Oakloan > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > what are the chances of getting OM to run in proxied mode? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am trying with the source-code revision that is currently > > > packaged > > > > on > > > > > > the > > > > > > > demo-server and did the following: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - deploy openlaszlo on red5 > > > > > > > - add /*.lzx handle & servlet to openmeetings web.xml > > > > > > > - changed build.xml so that OM *.lzx files are copied to red5 > om > > > > > webapps > > > > > > dir > > > > > > > > > > > > > > however - it doesn't work as in no clue why. where to start? is > > it > > > > > viable > > > > > > > anyhow? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > kind regards, > > > > > > > pete > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Sebastian Wagner > > > > http://www.openmeetings.de > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/openmeetings/ > > > > http://www.webbase-design.de > > > > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Sebastian Wagner > > http://www.openmeetings.de > > http://incubator.apache.org/openmeetings/ > > http://www.webbase-design.de > > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com > > [email protected] > > >
