My bad there is no such thing as rtmpts sorry for that
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 17:57, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>wrote: > I'm trying to test if all rtmp* are working. > So I'm > Checking if NOT secure version is working > 1) disable firewall open OM flash application: OM connects to rtmp > [success] > 2) enable firewall open OM flash application: OM connects to rtmpt > [success] > > Checking if secure version is working > 3) disable firewall open OM flash application: OM connects to rtmps > [success] > 4) enable firewall and would like to check if tunneled secure *rtmpts* works > as expected. > > or there is no rtmpts? > would requests be secure in case if useSSL is set to "yes" and tunneling > is on duty? > > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 17:44, [email protected] < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Why do you change source code to set up rtmps ? >> >> 2012/4/27 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>: >> > I set "restrictive" firewall on Ubuntu: all ports except for 22, 80 and >> 443 >> > are closed >> > I set up apache to redirect all calls to ports 80 and 443 to >> appropriate OM >> > ports >> > I have modified config.xml and set >> > <rtmpTunnelport>443</rtmpTunnelport> (to send all rtmpts traffic to >> > apache2 SSL port) >> > <useSSL>yes</useSSL> >> > <proxyType>best</proxyType> >> > >> > Modify hibRtmpConnection.lzx (under WebContent/src folder) >> > --- base/hibernate/hibRtmpConnection.lzx (revision 1331341) >> > +++ base/hibernate/hibRtmpConnection.lzx (working copy) >> > @@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ >> > this.counterror=0; >> > this.connect(); >> > } else { >> > - this.setAttribute('protocollName','rtmpt'); >> > + this.setAttribute('protocollName', canvas.useSSL ? >> 'rtmpts' >> > : 'rtmpt'); >> > >> this.setAttribute('protocollPort',canvas.rtmpTunnelport); >> > var src = getUrl(); >> > this.setAttribute('src',src); >> > >> > recompile and run >> > >> > according to the apache logs there were no request made to the 443 port. >> > >> > Everything work as expected in case I set up all parameters to use port >> 80 >> > and "rtmpt" >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 17:30, [email protected] < >> [email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Yes it should work. >> >> I think Stephen has tested this on his local machine too. There is no >> >> different between 1.9.x and 2.0 version regarding RTMP over native >> >> SSL. >> >> >> >> *set protocol to be "rtmpts" if useSSL is true and connection via >> >> rtmps is failed* >> >> => failed ?! What has failed to do with it? >> >> >> >> Edit red5/webapps/openmeetings/config.xml and set >> >> <rtmpsslport>5443</rtmpsslport> , <useSSL>yes</useSSL> and >> >> <proxyType>best</proxyType> >> >> >> >> proxyType to "best" is what makes the RTMPS connection use "native >> >> SSL" and NOT the old RTMPS implementation (which would be RTMP HTTP >> >> Tunneling over SSL) >> >> >> >> Sebastian >> >> >> >> 2012/4/27 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>: >> >> > Hello Sebastian, >> >> > >> >> > I'm currently testing tunneling in OM (to set everything up on port >> 80 >> >> > only) >> >> > while this testing I did the following: >> >> > set protocol to be "rtmpts" if useSSL is true and connection via >> >> > rtmps is >> >> > failed >> >> > >> >> > but unfortunately there seems to be no packets sent (according to the >> >> > apache2 logs) >> >> > >> >> > Do you know is rtmpts should work as expected in OM? >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > WBR >> >> > Maxim aka solomax >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Sebastian Wagner >> >> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock >> >> http://www.openmeetings.de >> >> http://www.webbase-design.de >> >> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com >> >> [email protected] >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > WBR >> > Maxim aka solomax >> >> >> >> -- >> Sebastian Wagner >> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock >> http://www.openmeetings.de >> http://www.webbase-design.de >> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com >> [email protected] >> > > > > -- > WBR > Maxim aka solomax > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
