It is impossible to proxy rtmpt based on the context. Requests sent are go to /open /idle etc. Ignoring context. I can send you logs and links proofing this On Apr 28, 2012 6:51 PM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
> We did solve to redirect rtmp traffic by using different path segments, > mod_proxy rule was path based. > > In the config.xml you can specify different paths for HTTP and RTMP URLs > (RTMPT will be handled with same path segments as RTMP) > > the config values are: > RTMP Path segment: <webAppRootKey>openmeetings</webAppRootKey> > HTTP Path segment <httpRootKey>/openmeetings/</httpRootKey> > > => RTMP URL will be: rtmp://localhost:$rtmpport/$webAppRootKey/ > => RTMPT URL will be: rtmpt://localhost:$rtmpTunnelport/$webAppRootKey/ > => HTTP Download/Upload URL will be: > $protocol://localhost:$red5httpport$httpRootKey [missing / is no typo, the > slash is in the httpRootKey so that you can make openmeetings directly run > in WEB-ROOT with the path <httpRootKey>/</httpRootKey> ] > > Now you can modify config.xml to: > <webAppRootKey>openmeetings_rtmp</webAppRootKey> > And add a mod_proxy rule: > traffic to openmeetings_rtmp port 80 redirect to localhost:1935 > OR the same for RTMPT > > The issue is just you can configure rtmp AND rtmpt to have DIFFERENT a path > segmements. Cause that would enable you to have mod_proxy settings for > both. > But I did always then just configure RTMPT to port 443. And that way I have > HTTP => Port 80 > RTMP => Port 80 > RTMPT => Port 443 > > Of course you can also add one more mod_proxy rule: > Redirect: $httpRootKey to localhost:5080, that way you can run yoru website > AND OpenMeetings on port 80. > > Sebastian > > 2012/4/28 Alexei Fedotov <[email protected]> > > > 3) ... > > any TCP/IP connection does not operate with paths > > from the other side there may be several client connections connected > > to the same server and port > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Alexei Fedotov > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > http://helpx.adobe.com/flash-media-server/kb/ports-firewalls-flash-media-server.html > > > shows how to initiate rtmp over different port > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Alexei Fedotov > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> 1) it is impossible to redirect RTMP traffic > > >>>> no quick answer > > >> > > >> 2) RTMPT contain all HTTP headers/cookies etc. == overhead > > >>>> overhead is even bigger because it uses 6 bit from every 8 of binary > > traffic > > >> > > >> 3) even if you think you perform > > rtmpt://server:port/openmeetings/hibernate > > >> all packets are sent to rtmpt://server:port/ (this is why it is > > impossible > > >> to proxy just RTMPT context) > > >>>> no quick answer > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> problems while implementing OOCP > > >> 1) it will be impossible to use RTMP with it (please see 1) above) > > >>>> noone asks for it > > >> > > >> 2) it will be additional traffic (please see 2)) > > >>>> you use OOCP is fallback when 1935 is not available > > >> > > >> 3) it will be impossible to use current scheme (tomcat + apache + > > >> mod_proxy) (please see 3)) NOTE mod_rewrite is able to help here, but > it > > >> also have own limitations. > > >>>> what breaks current scheme? > > >> > > >> I'm not sure if I be able to create transparent proxy inside tomcat, > but > > >> I'll try. > > >>>> there are few proxy solutions for Tomcat already > > >> > > >> -- > > >> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями, > > >> Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов, > > >> http://dataved.ru/ > > >> +7 916 562 8095 > > >> > > >> > > >> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Maxim Solodovnik < > [email protected]> > > wrote: > > >>> statements > > >>> 1) it is impossible to redirect RTMP traffic > > >>> 2) RTMPT contain all HTTP headers/cookies etc. == overhead > > >>> 3) even if you think you perform > > rtmpt://server:port/openmeetings/hibernate > > >>> all packets are sent to rtmpt://server:port/ (this is why it is > > impossible > > >>> to proxy just RTMPT context) > > >>> > > >>> problems while implementing OOCP > > >>> 1) it will be impossible to use RTMP with it (please see 1) above) > > >>> 2) it will be additional traffic (please see 2)) > > >>> 3) it will be impossible to use current scheme (tomcat + apache + > > >>> mod_proxy) (please see 3)) NOTE mod_rewrite is able to help here, but > > it > > >>> also have own limitations. > > >>> > > >>> I'm not sure if I be able to create transparent proxy inside tomcat, > > but > > >>> I'll try. > > >>> > > >>> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 17:14, Alexei Fedotov < > > [email protected]>wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> I don't think multiple ports are problem - Timur's proof of concept > > >>>> shows they are not. > > >>>> > > >>>> The main problem is the following: something is already running on > 80 > > >>>> port. So exact requirement for the solution follows: > > >>>> > > >>>> 1. The only openmeetings communication port (OOCP) should be a part > of > > >>>> the configuration. By default it would be port 80, and for those who > > >>>> have somethings installed, they can move the port somewhere. > > >>>> > > >>>> 2. One should switch http or https for traffic over OOCP. > > >>>> > > >>>> 3. For OOCP over http I suggest using 1935 for RTMP, or falling back > > >>>> to rtmpt over OOCP. > > >>>> > > >>>> -- > > >>>> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями, > > >>>> Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов, > > >>>> http://dataved.ru/ > > >>>> +7 916 562 8095 > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 12:50 PM, [email protected] > > >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>> > Is this a question or a statement? > > >>>> > > > >>>> > You cannot run all services: http, https, rtmp, rtmpt, rtmps on > the > > >>>> > same port 80 and 443, you can only achieve that by cheating with > > >>>> > subdomains + redirect/mod_proxy rules in Apache HTTPD. > > >>>> > > > >>>> > Our configuration currently allows people to configure http + rtmp > > or > > >>>> > http + rtmpt on the same port. > > >>>> > However to practically achieve that you need Apache Webserver and > > >>>> > configured with mod_proxy. > > >>>> > > > >>>> > Sebastian > > >>>> > > > >>>> > 2012/4/28 Alexei Fedotov <[email protected]>: > > >>>> >> We have really long discussion on the subject: why does our > typical > > >>>> >> installation has two http servers - one is Apache jetty embedded > > into > > >>>> red5, > > >>>> >> and another is Apache Httpd which redirects traffic from port 80 > to > > >>>> >> different ports of our product. > > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> I faced strong resistance convincing people that decreasing > number > > of > > >>>> >> servers and ports is good. Of course the less servers we have, > less > > >>>> >> installation work we have - why should we discuss it? > > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> Finally I noticed why two servers may be good for some people. > This > > >>>> applies > > >>>> >> to the case when they want other http services like CMS or > > E-learning to > > >>>> >> run on the same machine. I was thinking mostly about our > > Openmeetings > > >>>> >> server farm, where are no advantages of keeping proxies, while > each > > >>>> httpd > > >>>> >> costs 200 Mb per server. > > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> So the question is if we should keep using different ports in > > >>>> openmeetings. > > >>>> >> Are there any other reasons I missed? > > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> Concerning Maxim advice of using VPN - in my corporate life I > > don't even > > >>>> >> have an admin password or a right to run non-microsoft > executables. > > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> Thanks. > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > -- > > >>>> > Sebastian Wagner > > >>>> > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > > >>>> > http://www.openmeetings.de > > >>>> > http://www.webbase-design.de > > >>>> > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com > > >>>> > [email protected] > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> WBR > > >>> Maxim aka solomax > > > > > > -- > Sebastian Wagner > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > http://www.openmeetings.de > http://www.webbase-design.de > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com > [email protected] >
