+1 -baskar
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 10:29 PM, [email protected] < [email protected]> wrote: > Dear OpenMeetings Community, > > I would like to start a vote about releasing Apache OpenMeetings 2.0 > Incubating RC3 > > RC2 was rejected by the Apache Foundation's Incubator PMC because of > missing specifications of exact JAR names in LICENSE and NOTICE files. They > claim that the exact JAR file names are needed to have a exact matching of > the section in the LICENSE file and the actual components. > > Main changes are covered in the Readme: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC3/README > > Full Changelog: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC3/CHANGELOG > > Release artefacts: > http://people.apache.org/~sebawagner/rc3/ > > Tag: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC3/ > > PGP release keys (signed using 93A30395): > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/project/KEYS > > Vote will be open for 72 hours. > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > My vote is +1. > > Best regards. > > -- > Sebastian Wagner > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > http://www.openmeetings.de > http://www.webbase-design.de > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com > [email protected] >
