RAT is a tool to check the sources of files that we produce, not files that we do not maintain and are derivate work licensed udner different terms. You could exclude those files from the RAT test from my point of view.
The more important thing will be to correctly mention those dependencies in the LICENSE file. Then it should fine. Sebastian 2012/8/7 German Grekhov <[email protected]>: > Hello. > > I try to set up Jenkins build for Teambox plugin. And first of all, it was > needed to make the code suitable for releasing, so I have checked that all > files contains license headers. > > But I can not automate this process. Teambox plugin uses 3rd party library > to make OAuth 2.0 requests. And the library is under MIT license. When I > tried to run Apache Rat for the plugin I found that it does not recognize > MIT license headers in library's files. > > I have found that it was a bug in the Apache Rat: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-49 (currently jira is broken) > > And it has already been fixed, but the Apache Rat 0.9 version was not > released yet. > > Do you have any ideas about what should we do? > > Thanks and best regards, > German Grekhov. -- Sebastian Wagner https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock http://www.webbase-design.de http://www.wagner-sebastian.com [email protected]
