Yes sure, such a method could potentiall be added also outside of the
SOAP/REST API.
There is no need to make such an API call available to the SOAP/REST API

Sebastian


2012/9/6 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>:
> In fact we don't need REST/SOAP to access data inside Wicket.
> Wicket is another JEE bean inside same tomcat and same context.
>
> If you take a look at current Admin/Users page it uses UserDAO only.
> Edit will be implemented the same way.
> Users entity will be used as Model object. It will be changed in the form
> and all changes will be reflected by Wicket, all we need is perform
> em.merge using UsersDAO.
>
> I'll try to make skeleton of all areas ASAP.
> I saw good Jquery plugin for calendar.
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 4:20 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]
>> wrote:
>
>> I think we can implement everything except the conference room itself
>> in the first iteration of the Ajax interface.
>> There are only some limited real-time communication areas outside of
>> the conference room.
>> My idea was to refactor everything except the conference room to
>> Ajax/JavaScript.
>> That way we get comfortable with the new framework and we can already
>> test/implement some basic functionalities with WebSockets.
>> Based on our experiences we can then in the second iteration start
>> refactoring the conference room itself to Ajax.
>>
>> For the first iteration I would suggest we use the existing SOAP/REST
>> API of openmeetings to generate regular HASHs like the "secureHash" to
>> enter a conference room.
>> We will have to add one more SOAP/REST call where it is possible to
>> not only set an external but also internal user id so that the user
>> does not get duplicated when he enters the conference room.
>> I can implement such functionality into the SOAP/REST API when we will
>> need it.
>> I think it should be possible that the client directly invokes the
>> REST API as it is situated on the server URL, there should be no
>> Cross-Site-Scripting issues.
>>
>> We just need to make sure that we keep in mind that in the second
>> iteration the conference room will be loaded into our Ajax interface.
>>
>> What do think about that?
>>
>> Sebasitan
>>
>>
>> 2012/9/6 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>:
>> > @Sebastian
>> > Alexey asks for room user list implemented in wicket.
>> > What do you think is this possible?
>> >
>> > Also could you tell me is this possible to "enter the room by public SID"
>> > i.e. in Wicket I work with DB and I would like to open the room for the
>> > current user.
>> > I can create SID for the user and need mechanism to open the room.
>> >
>> > Right now I'll try to
>> > 1) display room list
>> > 2) add couple of editable fields to the user
>> > 3) implement chat (able to send receive messages)
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 3:54 PM, [email protected] <
>> [email protected]
>> >> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I will test as soon as possible
>> >>
>> >> Btw: Reading the release notes of Wicket 6.0.0:
>> >>
>> >>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/migration-to-wicket-60.html#MigrationtoWicket6.0-UseJQueryasabackinglibraryforWicketAjaxfunctionality
>> >>
>> >> Wicket now natively uses jQuery for Ajax. This should be quite handy
>> >> for us as we decided to use jQuery anyway!
>> >>
>> >> Sebastian
>> >>
>> >> 2012/9/4 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>:
>> >> > Just commited improved Wicket app
>> >> >
>> >> > What was improved:
>> >> > 1) Application is now single paged
>> >> > 2) Application is available at
>> >> > http://localhost:5080/openmeetings/html(both old and new apps are
>> >> > accessible)
>> >> > 3) Only 1 menu item works as expected (Admin Users)
>> >> >
>> >> > What is not done
>> >> > 1) bookmarkable params need to be added (gmail style)
>> >> > 2) some more pages (available to USER not ADMIN)
>> >> > 3) functionality to edit User/handle errors
>> >> >
>> >> > any feedback is appreciated
>> >> >
>> >> > On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 12:35 AM, Raju Bitter <
>> >> > [email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Just a comment on using OpenLaszlo: Seeing that Gliffy
>> >> >> http://www.gliffy.com essentially rebuilt their HTML5 version of the
>> >> >> software not using OpenLaszlo, I don't know any major software
>> product
>> >> >> using the DHTML runtime besides what Laszlo does with Webtop (and I
>> >> >> still have to see a public version of Webtop running in DHTML in
>> >> >> production). I agree with Sebastian that it would be more future
>> proof
>> >> >> for OpenMeetings to not use OpenLaszlo for the HTML5 version of
>> >> >> OpenMeetings, unless there is any willingness to become involved with
>> >> >> DHTML runtime support - which is not very advisable for this project.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> - Raju
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > WBR
>> >> > Maxim aka solomax
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Sebastian Wagner
>> >> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>> >> http://www.webbase-design.de
>> >> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
>> >> [email protected]
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > WBR
>> > Maxim aka solomax
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sebastian Wagner
>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>> http://www.webbase-design.de
>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
>> [email protected]
>>
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax



-- 
Sebastian Wagner
https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
http://www.webbase-design.de
http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
[email protected]

Reply via email to