Packaged are renamed.
The only potential issue I can see is
"org.openmeetings.utils.crypt.MD5Implementation" config value.

Since I have added import/export of config values it might be imported with
wrong value ... not sure what is the best way to handle it

On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>wrote:

> You did everything right (from my point of view)
> I would only add some general component like base form with save/new
> buttons on the top to generalize interface.
>
> You already create UserForm with new Users() as model object by default
> and set ModelObject to the currently selected user.
> That was exactly what I was thinking of.
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 9:45 PM, [email protected] <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> *you are talking about AjaxRequestTarget.add(form)*
>> Yes that was the point where I wondered if it okayto re-add an already
>> added form.
>>
>> *I would leave form on the page, but change the underlying object.,
>> I can modify your code a little bit to give an example*
>> => Please do so :)
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Sebastian
>>
>> 2012/9/6 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>:
>> > I get it!
>> >
>> > you are talking about AjaxRequestTarget.add(form)
>> > by this call you tell Wicket to send new version of component to the
>> page.
>> > So it is OK to re-add it
>> >
>> > On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 8:54 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> I would not add/remove Form
>> >> I would leave form on the page, but change the underlying object.
>> >>
>> >> I can modify your code a little bit to give an example
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 8:42 PM, [email protected] <
>> >> [email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> One question on my tiny wicket script attempts :)
>> >>> If you add something, [in my example target.add(form) ]
>> >>> shouldn't I remove the form before adding it?
>> >>> Or does wicket care about it automatically?
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks!
>> >>> Sebastian
>> >>>
>> >>> 2012/9/6 [email protected] <[email protected]>:
>> >>> > I would not rename Java Objects now.
>> >>> > They have influence on the client side.
>> >>> > I would prefer renaming things when we have refactored to Ajax, as
>> we
>> >>> > can more easily fix the possible changes in the UI.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > I have committed a small form component (UserForm.java).
>> >>> > Could you review those script lines if that is the way you would do
>> it
>> >>> > in Wicket too?
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Sebastian
>> >>> >
>> >>> > 2012/9/6 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>:
>> >>> >> What about replacing persistence.beans with data.entity or maybe
>> >>> dao.entity
>> >>> >> and move entities to one folder with same naming
>> >>> >> like:
>> >>> >> PollType -> RoomPollType
>> >>> >> Rooms_Organisation -> RoomsOrganisation etc.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> What do you think?
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 7:32 PM, [email protected] <
>> >>> [email protected]
>> >>> >>> wrote:
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> Sure,
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> maybe at some point it would make sense to group some of the
>> packages.
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> Sebastian
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> 2012/9/6 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>:
>> >>> >>> > Maybe we can get rid of app package?
>> >>> >>> > like have
>> >>> >>> > org.apache.openmeetings.data package instead of
>> >>> >>> > org.apache.openmeetings.app.data?
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> > On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>> >>> [email protected]
>> >>> >>> >wrote:
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> >> The only places need also be updated are:
>> >>> >>> >> 1) *persistence.xml files
>> >>> >>> >> 2) openmeetings-applicationContext.xml
>> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >> I can handle it
>> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 6:40 PM, [email protected] <
>> >>> >>> >> [email protected]> wrote:
>> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >>> Hi,
>> >>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> >>> one thing I constantly notice but did not resolve yet is our
>> >>> package
>> >>> >>> >>> structure.
>> >>> >>> >>> We should fix that before we try to apply to graduate.
>> >>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> >>> Our package structure is:
>> >>> >>> >>> org.openmeetings.*
>> >>> >>> >>> it should be:
>> >>> >>> >>> org.apache.openmeetings.*
>> >>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> >>> Maybe it is a good moment to do that refactoring right now.
>> >>> >>> >>> What do you think, are there critical areas where there could
>> be
>> >>> >>> >>> potenial issues when doing this change?
>> >>> >>> >>> configs? What about the CLI installer, does it rely on some
>> of the
>> >>> >>> >>> package path's in the scripts?
>> >>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> >>> Sebastian
>> >>> >>> >>> --
>> >>> >>> >>> Sebastian Wagner
>> >>> >>> >>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>> >>> >>> >>> http://www.webbase-design.de
>> >>> >>> >>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
>> >>> >>> >>> [email protected]
>> >>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >> --
>> >>> >>> >> WBR
>> >>> >>> >> Maxim aka solomax
>> >>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> > --
>> >>> >>> > WBR
>> >>> >>> > Maxim aka solomax
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> --
>> >>> >>> Sebastian Wagner
>> >>> >>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>> >>> >>> http://www.webbase-design.de
>> >>> >>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
>> >>> >>> [email protected]
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> --
>> >>> >> WBR
>> >>> >> Maxim aka solomax
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > --
>> >>> > Sebastian Wagner
>> >>> > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>> >>> > http://www.webbase-design.de
>> >>> > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
>> >>> > [email protected]
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Sebastian Wagner
>> >>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>> >>> http://www.webbase-design.de
>> >>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
>> >>> [email protected]
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> WBR
>> >> Maxim aka solomax
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > WBR
>> > Maxim aka solomax
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sebastian Wagner
>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>> http://www.webbase-design.de
>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
>> [email protected]
>>
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>



-- 
WBR
Maxim aka solomax

Reply via email to