The general "echo" is rather negative.

For example Sam Ruby's answer a time ago was:
*The operative phrase here being "the terms of the GPL must be followed
when those plug-ins are distributed." This really sounds more like
something that would be made available at Apache Extras:*
Quoted from: http://markmail.org/message/33hztgfyfxdb3jef

Other follow up that, for example Jukka Zitting did say:
*I agree with that argument against the viral nature of GPL, but in general
the ASF has tended to honor the wishes of upstream copyright owners also
beyond the requirements of copyright law.*
Quoted from: http://markmail.org/message/je5hzdocsloofidd

So if the Vice President of Legal Affairs of the Apache Foundation and the
chair of the Apache Incubator thinks that it would be rather better to
release those plugins outside of the ASF I think chances to release them
inside require very good arguments and lot of time.

I agree to your position that it _should_ be possible to release under the
Apache License, but I think we should not make the graduation of our
project depending on the legal status of the plugins.
If the final decision is that its okay to release them under the Apache
License => Great! We can still move them to Apache at any time.

After all this looks like some kind of blocker that keeps us away from
moving forward. apache-extras.org might be a good way to resolve this and
keep concentrating on enhancing our core product.

Sebastian

2012/10/11 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>

> I always thought that since our code contains zero lines of code under
> incompatible license we are free to release it under ASF. I do remember
> this was confirmed by last email from legal team
> On Oct 11, 2012 9:24 PM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > before we try to organize a Vote for graduation it might makes sense to
> > clean up plugins from the SVN that have unclear legal status.
> >
> > I started to move Moodle to apache-extras.org and Drupal. Cause the
> > discussion already has gone quite far that it is not acceptable to
> > distribute them at the ASF.
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> > Sebastian
> >
> > --
> > Sebastian Wagner
> > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> > http://www.webbase-design.de
> > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
> > [email protected]
> >
>



-- 
Sebastian Wagner
https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
http://www.webbase-design.de
http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
[email protected]

Reply via email to