I think my mail setup garbled the From address which may have made the mail fail. Sorry about that. Here we go again ...
Werner Almesberger wrote: > Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:53:58 -0300 > From: Werner Almesberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Andy Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Sean McNeil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [email protected], > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Power supply and resume ordering meddling > > Andy Green wrote: > > Also power removal or arrival at the USB socket ("USB insert / remove") > > is a wake event if you're suspended; BATFULL can be too although that'll > > get you fake wakes. > > I guess as soon as we want real charging state indications (and don't > have separate hardware to take care of it), those BATFULL wakeups become > very non-fake :-) > > I'm a bit confused about this discussion now. Isn't Holger implementing > a solution now that will not require any kernel-side policy for what > happens when charger/charging state changes ? > > (I have a long rant to send in case we're drifting back towards trying to > do it in the kernel :) > > - Werner
