Andy Green wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Somebody in the thread at some point said: > > | Some of the defconfig's have CONFIG_APM_POWER enabled, some don't. I > | know enabling this on the GTA01 breaks apm; do we need this set for > | GTA02? If we set this, I think part of the code in pcf50633.c doesn't > | do anything anymore, which is why I'm asking about this. > > For packaging John Lee asked for the gta01 and 02 ones broken out > separately which I did (the defconfig_gta01 in git does not have > APM_POWER enabled), but I heard someone complaining the other day about > defconfig_om_blah in the packaging stuff, which I never saw. > > Also some folks suspend by using apm -s IIRC, maybe pulling it from > GTA02 will upset that. Otherwise, sounds good to get rid of it AFAIK.
apm-emulation seems to control that; the apm_power stuff seems to break the values read from /proc/apm for the battery levels. I guess I should just try it both ways on the GTA02 and see if what's reported by /proc/apm is different. > - -Andy Mike (mwester)
