Andy Green wrote: > We need a name that describes what it does, not a name shrouded in > nudge-nudge references. "Factory initialization" is fine.
We have two things that may need new names: - the one currently called kboot-stage1. The "stage1" part is good, but I feel that the "kboot" part will lead to confusion, since there are too many things that are being called "kboot". That's the one I suggested we could call "figleaf". - the one currently called devirginator. Politicial correctness, aside it also makes sense to give this a new name for GTA03, since almost the entire process changes, so there's no point in trying to adapt the existing devirginator. (We can steal a few bits from it, though.) This is the one Mike suggested to call "initial flash". (Which seems descriptive enough to me, and "ini-tial flash" leaves my tongue in a lot fewer knots than "fac-to-ry ini-tial-i-za-tion".) - Werner
