On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 03:40:07PM +0100, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> > I don't know if that's part of what he has to get straight for pcf50606
> > to be meaningful, but I am sure the quality and reliability of any
> > figures it will give are going to be continue to be poor compared to
> > GTA02 with HDQ smart battery where you can pretty much believe the
> > capacity number completely, there's not a huge amount to be done about it.
>
> Sure, we can't expect things the hardware does not offer. Getting what it
> offers
> through th same interface as on GTA02 is fine for us.
OK, pcf50633 does not offer a sysfs for battery voltage. But I think it
can't be done away with for PCF50606..
- Balaji
