-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Somebody in the thread at some point said: | Hi, | | Andy Green wrote: | Somebody in the thread at some point said: | | Somebody in the thread at some point said: | | | Prepare current kernel to support the new android layer | | | | | kernel/power/power.h | 31 +- | | | kernel/power/process.c | 28 +- | | | | Hi Michael - | | | | It seems we are missing some pre-patch on kernel/power/process.c, | | because the patch here does not apply on there (not due to 2.6.29-rc2 | | uplevel either). | | Another issue seems to be stuff has moved into this new drivers/staging | place in 2.6.29. There seems to be some android stuff in there already | (./drivers/staging/android) we will need to be compatible with. | | -Andy |> | As I suppose they move in a directory, so I just patch on that? I have | few diff.
Yes if you can patch against the upstream state in ./drivers/staging/android I think it will be easier. If you can also make a patch to destroy our old tree in ./drivers/android cleanly that'd reduce confusion too. If we can keep everything in ./drivers/staging/android then I can diff that directory when I rebase from upstream and hopefully it won't be a big mess. - -Andy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkmAT2QACgkQOjLpvpq7dMoAuACePvPzSbFObL2cR3LIEd0E61lP fB0An1Upe9vvB1Zog7iUQpaqIs1oXVCM =bx9p -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
