Andy Green wrote: > Considering SD boot works fine with Qi the only truly critical block is > only erase block +0 containing Qi -- 8K of that block is always read at > boot without ECC anyway AFAIK. So we're talking about protecting 2/3rds > of the bootloader with ECC... I think it's acceptable risk until someone > shows failure from this, not to mention the ECC support itself will > increase the size of bootloader and risk of bit error.
I was more thinking of the case when booting the kernel or boot GUI from NAND on GTA02. There, a lot more blocks are involved ... - Werner
