-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Somebody in the thread at some point said: | [Obviously if this patch is accepted we need to tell developers about | it. I have a number of other improvements to the accelerometers I | hope to deliver over the next couple of weeks. They will have minimal | or zero disruption to current code. ]
| - input_report_rel(lis->input_dev, REL_X, mg_per_sample * | + input_report_abs(lis->input_dev, ABS_X, mg_per_sample * | + set_bit(EV_ABS, lis->input_dev->evbit); The accelerations have a relative effect on position, but the accelerations themselves are absolute it seems. However, changing it would likely break most of the userspace accelerometer code for no gain other than correct book-keeping really. What's the downside of just leaving these as relative? - -Andy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkm0OmkACgkQOjLpvpq7dMpA9wCdEWYb8A69bB5T8dbCxqvqVaWx VDgAnjfaBtGKYjMq2ihdPQHuw1ho05pR =2CNM -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
