Nicolas Dufresne wrote: > I've currently started testing a patch that re-implement Andy reset > switch with a slightly different approach. Everything seems to be fine > for now on Qi and I'll move to U-Boot before the end of the day. The > only thing I'm not sure of is the time delays required when setting > Glamo GPIO4 on/off (ping called LCM_RESET in schematics) that I'm > combining with software reset of jbt registers in jbt_init_regs() (as > documented in bug #1841 by Joerg comment). That information can only be > provided by an OM employee, which is why I asked previously.
Any update on this issue? Is it still the case that at the moment we have _NO_ working version on the andy-tracking branch for a stable release? Mike (mwester)
