On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 11:19:52AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 01:04:16AM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > > The register cache size is of by one. There are 63 registers in use but the > > register cache size has only space for 62. > > Furthermore the codec's reg_cache_size is of by another one. Since the > > wm8753 > > register cache uses one-based indexing we have to add one to its size.
> As discussed in reply to your posting on lkml only 62 of the registers > are cached so the adjustments in cache size would appear to be > incorrect. ...though with your clarification that's not actually the case and the patch should be OK as-is.
