On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 07:09:51PM -0300, Werner Almesberger wrote: > Nelson Castillo wrote:
> > The main problem now is that there is no way from userpace to > > communicate back to the kernel. But this might not be needed if it's > > OK to lose some computing power (not much I guess). > You mean for the sample rate change ? It seems that this is the > kind of kernel change that wouldn't face much resistance. Yes, this is useful for other applications like changing the rate to reflect changes between high bandwidth applications like handwriting recognition and ones with much lower bandwidth requirements like simple button selection.
